[darcs-devel] [issue359] patch applied (ghc): q

[Simon Peyton-Jones]

New submission from Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>:

Sorry.  I mis-typed.  Then I tried to un-record the patch I had recorded.  Darcs crashed (log below).

Since I cannot un-record it, all I could do was to push it.

Sigh

Anyway, it's a small change fixing a bug in TcSimplify that mixed up implication constraints and implicit parameters; it fixes one of the two bugs reported in Trac #1033

Simon

| -----Original Message-----
| From: cvs-all-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:cvs-all-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Lemmih
| Sent: 01 December 2006 15:28
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: cvs-ghc at haskell.org
| Subject: Re: patch applied (ghc): q
|
| On 12/1/06, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
| > Thu Nov 30 19:42:07 PST 2006  simonpj at microsoft.com
| >   * q
| >
| >     M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3
| >     M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -4 +1
|
| q?

sh-2.04$ darcs unrecord

Fri Dec  1 03:42:07 GMT Standard Time 2006  simonpj at microsoft.com
  * q
Shall I unrecord this patch? (1/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y

Wed Nov 29 22:52:43 GMT Standard Time 2006  simonpj at microsoft.com
  * Remove trace
Shall I unrecord this patch? (2/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d

darcs.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra:
Fri Apr  7 11:18:39 GMT Standard Time 2006  Simon Marlow <simonmar at microsoft.com>
  * Fix a bug related to threads blocked on blackholes
  We weren't making them live early enough, with the result that
  finalizable objects referred to only by a thread blocked on a black
  hole could be finalized too early (see conc057 test).
Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?

----------
messages: 1304
nosy: EricKow, cvs-ghc, droundy, lemmih, simonpj, tommy
status: unread
title: patch applied (ghc): q

____________________________________
Darcs issue tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue359>
____________________________________