[darcs-devel] Greetings and some questions

[Eric Y. Kow]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:26:08 -0700, David Roundy wrote:
> And I like to keep modules consisted in this respect, so older modules
> should remain all_underscore, unless someone wants to refactor them
> (which doesn't seem worth the effort).

So you would not object if somebody submitted patches that darcs
replaced the underscore_using exported functions with camelCase
equivalents...

But would you object if somebody submitted a patch that made *all*
functions camelCase?  I understand it's less readable for you, but
saying "all camelCase" seems somewhat easier to explain and implement
than "camelCase only for things which we export" (which changes easily
anyway).  It seems like an all camelCase switch would make things
marginally easier for newbies (I remember asking myself the question
once...).  Would it make things significantly harder for you?

In any case, thanks for piping up about this!

-- 
Eric Kow                     http://www.loria.fr/~kow
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9         Merci de corriger mon français.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20061002/b4f4448f/attachment.pgp