[darcs-devel] darcs patch: Expose more PatchInfo parts and switch t... (and 1 more)

[David Roundy]

On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:37:55AM +0200, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> We probably want this to be pi_author, even thogh they do the same
> thing.
...
> I'm not entirely sure, but my feeling is that the pi_ functions leave
> the string a state as possible, where as the just_ functions allow for
> some fiddling, specifically the 'UNDO' which just_name adds.  We might
> look into renaming some of these functions to make it clear.
> 
> Note that I had added pi_name for amend-record, and threw in pi_author
> for consistency. Maybe that was unwise...

I guess maybe I didn't notice that pi_author was added.  I'd rather not
have two identical functions.  Perhaps we should rename just_author?
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20070731/ff34181f/attachment.pgp