[darcs-devel] a couple of quick timings

[zooko]

per droundy's request, here are timings of this same task with hashed- 
format:

time tar xjvf ciphercycles-20070205.tar.bz2

time darcs-2pre init --hashed

0m0.0s

time darcs-2pre add -r ciphercycles-20070205

0m5.7s

time darcs-2pre record --all --author=zooko at zooko.com -m'init import  
of ciphercycles-20070205'
15m44.0s

Oh, I just realized that I was compiling ghc in another window, but  
this record took 15 minutes just like the darcs-1-format record did,  
so I guess running a ghc compile in another window didn't interfere  
with the benchmark too much!

Regards,

Zooko



On Feb 6, 2008, at 11:29 AM, zooko wrote:

> time tar xjvf ciphercycles-20070205.tar.bz2
>
> hg 0m2.4s
>
> time darcs-1.1.0pre init
>
> 0m0.6s
>
> time darcs-1.1.0pre add -r ciphercycles-20070205
>
> 0m2.8s
>
> time darcs-1.1.0pre record --all --author=zooko at zooko.com -m'init
> import of ciphercycles-20070205'
>
> 0m46.7s
>
> # and now with darcs-2
>
> time tar xjvf ciphercycles-20070205.tar.bz2
>
> 0m2.5s
>
> time darcs-2pre init
>
> 0m0.8s
>
> time darcs-2pre add -r ciphercycles-20070205
>
> 0m3.1s
>
> time darcs-2pre record --all --author=zooko at zooko.com -m'init import
> of ciphercycles-20070205'
>
> 15m57.4s
>
>
> # Yes -- that is not a typo -- it took 15 minutes.
>
> # and now with mercurial:
>
> time tar xjvf ciphercycles-20070205.tar.bz2
>
> 0m2.3s
>
> time hg init
>
> 0m0.1s
>
> time hg addremove
>
> 0m1.4s
>
> time hg commit -m'init import of ciphercycles-20070205'
>
> 0m2.3s
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Zooko
>
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-devel mailing list
> darcs-devel at darcs.net
> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel