[darcs-users] [darcs-devel] [issue885] get --to-match 'hash' => _darcs/tentative_pristine: openBinaryFile: does not exist (2.0.0 Regression)

David Roundy daveroundy at gmail.com
Thu Aug 14 17:51:47 UTC 2008


Petr, if your code is going  to work around bugs rather than fixing
them, yes, I will ask you to rewrite it.  I gave you a simple way to
tell when this is happening, and now you're going to leave in a huff?
If you don't care about the quality and maintainability of darcs'
code, then we're better off without you.  If you do care about darcs'
quality, you should learn to accept feedback to improve your code.

Darcs is a huge code written by many people, which no one fully
understands, and learning to work on darcs takes time and patience.
And I don't have the time for patient hand-holding.

David

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Petr Ročkai <bugs at darcs.net> wrote:
> Patch's been rejected because of violating some sort of unwritten rule about
> module imports. I have no intention to refactor the surrounding code to appease
> these rules just to get the fix through -> unassigning, kthxbai.


More information about the darcs-users mailing list