[darcs-users] darcs patch: DRAFT: Refactor "darcs get" help.

[Trent W. Buck]

Before I can finalize this draft, I need a fact check for this:

  % FIXME: If --no-pristine-tree is used, and then someone changes the
  % working tree, will "darcs whatsnew" break, or just be very slow?
  %
  % FIXME: I also expected --no-pristine-tree to break --lazy,
  % since --lazy works by copying the pristine tree.  When I
  % tested --no-pristine-tree with a darcs-2 repo, I found that it
  % copied the pristine tree!  Does this mean that --no-pristine-tree is
  % only for deprecated darcs-1 formats (hashed and
  % old-fashioned-inventory)?
  %
  % --twb, 2008-12-07

  \begin{options}
  --no-pristine-tree
  \end{options}
  In order to save disk space, you can use {\tt get} with the
  \verb|--no-pristine-tree| flag to create a repository with no pristine
  tree.  Please see Section~\ref{disk-usage} for more information.

Sun Dec  7 18:46:26 EST 2008  Trent W. Buck <trentbuck at gmail.com>
  * DRAFT: Refactor "darcs get" help.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/x-darcs-patch
Size: 64709 bytes
Desc: A darcs patch for your repository!
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20081207/9f686e12/attachment-0001.bin