[darcs-users] darcs patch: Note first batch of openssl license exceptions granted.

[David Roundy]

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:24:21PM +0000, E.Y.Kow at brighton.ac.uk wrote:
> Hmm... David isn't too happy with the Eclipse part.
> 
> I personally don't care either way, so it may be up to Zooko to
> open this debate.
> 
> Anyway, let's finish collecting these and see.  I'm going on the idea here that
> if people grant all three, then they implicitly grant a just-openssl exception.

On further reading, I actually don't mind the eclipse-license bit.
For some reason I was thinking we were dual-licensing darcs, which
would reduce its copyleftness, but since we're only allowing linking
with code that is actually under the eclipse license, that's okay.  I
don't know why anyone would want to link darcs with code under the
eclipse license, but I don't suppose that's my business.

David