[darcs-users] darcs patch: resolve issue864: check non-force replace against pending (and 2 more)

[Tommy Pettersson]

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:53:32AM -0400, David Roundy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:46:52AM +0200, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
> > Current darcs requires --force only if the replace is unclean in
> > *both* recorded and unrecorded. I fail to see the logic in this.
[...]
> Here's the logic: in only one of the possibilities does force add hunk
[...]

Thanks, I now see.

I'll resend the first patch that fix the regression, and (when I
get time) I'll send a code documentation patch that explains
this behavior.


-- 
Tommy Pettersson <ptp at lysator.liu.se>