[darcs-users] darcs-2 help behavior
Trent W. Buck
trentbuck at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 04:59:14 UTC 2008
Matthias Kilian <kili at outback.escape.de> writes:
> - Therefore, the complaint in the first URL you mentioned has a point
> (--help, or -? should produce *short* output). I'm not even sure
> wether the advanced options should be printed by darcs at all
> (this stuff belongs into the manpage).
+1.
The current help output is too long. Advanced help should be moved to
something like darcs help --advanced foo or darcs foo --full-help, or
ommitted entirely.
(Obviously the normal --help output would mention that this extended
resource existed, and refer the user to it.)
> - Usage output (be it via --help, -?, --gimmeaclue) should be written to
> stdout, not to stderr -- AFAIK this isn't an issue for darcs, but I
> hate it *so much* if I've to type something like
>
> foo --help 2>&1 | more
>
> for some `foo' tool that I mention it here ;-)
+1. BTDTBTTS.
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list