[darcs-users] Gitit moinmoin support
Max Battcher
me at worldmaker.net
Tue Apr 14 06:16:12 UTC 2009
Gour wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Michael <simon at joyful.com> writes:
>
> Simon> Are there specific unsupported features that we use, or need ?
>
> According to pandoc's README: "Note that the rst reader only parses a
> subset of reStructuredText syntax. For example, it doesn’t handle
> tables, option lists, or footnotes. But for simple documents it should
> be adequate."
>
> (see http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/README.html)
If we want to make a feature request for reST syntax that pandoc should
support that should be important to darcs, Option Lists should be a high
priority.
Option lists look mostly like darcs' current help output for --options
and allow for nicer formatting of them in richer environments like HTML.
Darcs has a lot of options and option lists are obviously handy for that.
Tables and Footnotes are certainly nice-to-haves, but probably not as
immediately useful to darcs as Option Lists.
--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list