[darcs-users] darcs patch: Revert --restrict-paths removal. (and 2 more)

[Eric Kow]

Hi David,

I'm almost ready to apply this patch, thanks to Florent's review, but
before I do so, I would like to see a use case of where this would
actually be a good thing to have.  Could you supply one, preferably in
the form a a user manual patch?

Thanks!

P.S. typo: s/tempering/tampering/

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 17:29:27 +0100, Florent Becker wrote:
> Eric Kow <kowey at darcs.net> writes:
> 
> > Florent,
> >
> > Is there any chance you would be available to review this patch?  I'm
> > asking because Dmitry's laptop is broken and he is consequently out of
> > action :-)
> 
> The patch is ok (it does what it says on the tin), i'd like to see some
> tests added to the shell tests, and an example in the manual.
> >
> > Also, darcs users and hackers, any objections in principle?
> 
> Would it make sense to have a per-repository whitelist of safe paths
> which would otherwise be rejected as unsafe?

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20090104/9b50c2a3/attachment.pgp