[darcs-users] darcs patch: Improve memory usage of darcs check and ... (and 1 more)
Bertram Felgenhauer
int-e at gmx.de
Tue Mar 10 23:06:46 UTC 2009
Bertram Felgenhauer wrote:
> === zoo/darcs ===
>
> || 2.2.0-ac | +patch
> ==========++=============+===========
> check || 43.1s 154M | 24.9s 21M
^^^^^
Not sure why this number was so large.
> get full || 15.9s 10M | 16.1s 10M
> get lazy || 0.9s 3M | 0.8s 3M
> pull 100 || 6.6s 11M | 6.4s 11M
> pull 1000 || 49.7s 35M | 51.6s 31M
> repair || 32.7s 153M | 31.9s 19M
Eric asked for numbers for 2.1.0, so here they are:
=== zoo/darcs ===
|| 2.1.0-ac | 2.2.0-ac | +patch
==========++=============+=============+============
check || 26.2s 21M | 28.3s 155M | 24.9s 21M
get full || 9.4s 10M | 16.0s 10M | 16.0s 10M
get lazy || 0.4s 3M | 0.9s 3M | 0.8s 3M
pull 100 || 5.8s 12M | 6.1s 15M | 5.6s 15M
pull 1000 || 59.0s 41M | 44.1s 31M | 43.2s 31M
repair || 43.8s 187M | 28.6s 150M | 24.9s 21M
Note that 'repair' was actually worse in 2.1.0 than in 2.2.0
Bertram
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list