[darcs-users] Do you really mean resolved here?

[Trent W. Buck]

Thorkil Naur <naur at post11.tele.dk> writes:

>> status: wont-fix -> resolved
>
> Now, I don't really care, but it seems useful to be consistent about the 
> status usage. I also considered changing to resolved, but my thinking was 
> that, since the issue is really pointing at a potential problem in the 
> manual, changing the status to resolved would seem to imply that we had 
> actually changed the manual accordingly, somehow.

Maybe if the "resolved" status were renamed to "done", people would be
less likely to misapply[0] it?

[0] per the semantics described on the wiki.  (Sorry, I'm too lazy to
    find the precise page.)