[darcs-users] Benchmarking "get"
Ian Lynagh
igloo at earth.li
Tue Mar 17 21:55:52 UTC 2009
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:49:52PM -0600, zooko wrote:
>
> He also reported the sizes of the repositories:
>
> $ du -sb git-side
> 76990124 git-side
>
> $ du -sb darcs-side/
> 57285206 darcs-side/
Oh, that's something I hadn't looked at:
275656 camp
171656 darcs1
475400 darcs1hashed
208900 darcs2
433980 git
(campfrag omitted because it doesn't make sense).
darcs1, darcs1hashed and darcs2 have all the patches (separately)
compressed. I assume the large usage in darcs1hashed and darcs2
is due to orphaned hash pristine files. If I do a get on all the repos,
and also make uncompressed *un copies, then:
275656 camp
172464 darcs1
331924 darcs1un
172464 darcs1darcs2
331976 darcs1darcs2un
160476 darcs1hashed
326780 darcs1hashedun
162020 darcs2
330000 darcs2un
431632 git
So all the darcs compressed and uncompressed repos are about the same
size as each other. camp (uncompressed) sits in the middle. git is
surprisingly (to me) large, but I don't know what it stores.
Thanks
Ian
More information about the darcs-users
mailing list