[darcs-users] Darcs for GHC

[Peter Hercek]

Petr Rockai wrote:
> Tommy Pettersson <ptp at lysator.liu.se> writes:
>
>   
>> I'm in favor of amend-record on steroids, but just want to point
>> out (maybe the obvious) that it is not a general solution for
>> the long-lived branch problem. It works if the "branch" is a
>> single repo, but it doesn't scale with the dynamic behavior of
>> darcs, i.e., a group of people working on separate copies of a
>> "branch".
>>     
>
> Good point. It's the same problem that rebase has, though -- the branch has to
> be private (or alternatively, means outside of VCS need to be used to
> synchronise participants)

There is a ticket for this:
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue891
There is some overlap in functionality between ticket 891 and ticket
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue938
mentioned by Trent.

Peter.