<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Max Battcher <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:me@worldmaker.net">me@worldmaker.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Hamish Allan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Surely a post-hoc move must be an extremely common operation? What am I missing?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Doing the darcs move after a physical mv generally "just works".<br>
<br>
Also, if you think darcs is "out of sync" with what you think the current working directory state is regarding adds/removes/moves, you may try deleting _darcs/patches/pending. (This is the file where darcs stores adds/moves until they are recorded.)</blockquote>
<div><br>I don't have a machine handy to test, but I think darcs revert also works on pending? Meaning that you don't have to go into the "special" directories to fix it. Well, I could be wrong as I haven't tested this in a while.<br>
<br>Jason<br></div></div><br>