[darcs-devel] Re: bug in get_extra
Mark Stosberg
mark at summersault.com
Tue Nov 16 06:15:05 PST 2004
On 2004-11-16, Jim Radford <radford at blackbean.org> wrote:
>
> A bit more specifically, I have a bunch of patches generated with
> cvsps on which I ran the following
>
> darcs init;
> for p in ../*.patch; do
> patch -sp1 < ../$p
> perl darcs-metadata-from-cvsps-header ../$p | \
> darcs record -a --look-for-adds --pipe
> done
>
> After using the resulting darcs repository for a while I noticed the
> mis-attribution. I then edited one of the patch files to correct the
> author and re-ran the above generating a new initial version of the
> repository. I thought that pushing the new repository to the
> repository I'd been using would just push that one patch or at worst
> get come kind of conflict on that patch.
>
>> > Either way, it does produce:
>
>> > bug in get_extra - please report this!
Thanks for these details. :)
> Though, yes, I probably should have used the bug database, but I
> didn't feel like signing up and thinking of "yet another password".
Our bug system doesn't currently require, or even allow, people to sign
up for accounts. You either simply send a bug report by e-mail, or use
the 'guest' account in the web-based interface.
Mark
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list