[darcs-devel] darcs patch: really suppress output in win32 exec
Nikolas Coukouma
lists at atrus.org
Sat Dec 17 17:29:06 PST 2005
Will wrote:
>Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek at pps.jussieu.fr> writes:
>
>
>
>>>+exec c args "/dev/null" "/dev/null" =
>>>+ system $ c++" "++careful_unwords args++" > NUL 2>&1"
>>>
>>>
>>I'm a little confused by this patch, but I'm by no means familiar with
>>Windows, so bear with me if I speak nonsense.
>>
>>I didn't realise that Windows shells support the ``>&'' notation. Do
>>you know whether all versions do? Can you confirm whether this breaks
>>Windows 2000 and Windows 9x? If it does, do we care?
>>
>>
>
>NT-based versions of Windows should support '>&', which includes
>Windows 2000. I would guess that it doesn't work under Win9x, but
>have no way to test.
>
>Regards,
>Will
>
Redirecting standard error is available only in the NT-derivatives.
Would just using "@echo off & (command)" work in this context?
http://www.robvanderwoude.com/redirection.html
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list