[darcs-devel] should --look-for-adds imply --summary ?

[Mark Stosberg]

On 2005-02-25, David Roundy <droundy at abridgegame.org> wrote:
>
> But I'm not sure what kind of a crazy person would use -l without
> -s... wouldn't that just give way too much output anyways?

I think "-l" without -s" /is/ silly. I don't know that CVS had a command
lik thate (and I didn't miss it there either!).

So why not make --look-for-adds imply --summary ?

Then we could all save a keystroke for a common command. :)

 darcs whatsnew -l

    Mark

-- 
http://mark.stosberg.com/