[darcs-devel] Re: wxDarcs and withRepoLock

[Eric Kow]

On 29 janv. 06, at 01:06, Eric Kow wrote:
> But one horrible thing that happens is that the record command never 
> gets around to releasing its repository lock, even if you close the 
> Record window (2).  It doesn't matter if you actually record something 
> or if you cancel.  Both options leave the lock behind.  It seems as 
> though the record command never comes back when you close the Record 
> window.  Indeed, if you modify Record.lhs, inserting a putStrLn like 
> so:

Problem solved - it's nothing to do with locks or darcs.  Simply put, 
wxhaskell does not like it when you call start within something else 
that already called start.


--  
Eric Kow                     http://www.loria.fr/~kow
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9         Merci de corriger mon français.