[darcs-devel] darcs patch: Amending a patch doesn't remove explicit dependencies

Eric Y. Kow eric.kow at gmail.com
Sat Nov 18 08:48:05 PST 2006


On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:07:59 +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
> > [Amending a patch doesn't remove explicit dependencies
> > edwin.thomson at gmail.com**20061110222837].

I'm going to accept this (thanks for fixing that!), but I agree with
Tommy that we should try to keep our interfaces minimal.

Another way might be just to replace infopatch by infodepspatch (perhaps
using infopatch as a name).  Infopatch doesn't seem to be used in many
places, and perhaps being explicit about your deps (you know you're
passing [] in) is a good idea.

-- 
Eric Kow                     http://www.loria.fr/~kow
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9         Merci de corriger mon français.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20061118/3b0a74f2/attachment.pgp


More information about the darcs-devel mailing list