[darcs-devel] darcs patch: Amending a patch doesn't remove
explicit dependencies
Eric Y. Kow
eric.kow at gmail.com
Sat Nov 18 08:48:05 PST 2006
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:07:59 +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
> > [Amending a patch doesn't remove explicit dependencies
> > edwin.thomson at gmail.com**20061110222837].
I'm going to accept this (thanks for fixing that!), but I agree with
Tommy that we should try to keep our interfaces minimal.
Another way might be just to replace infopatch by infodepspatch (perhaps
using infopatch as a name). Infopatch doesn't seem to be used in many
places, and perhaps being explicit about your deps (you know you're
passing [] in) is a good idea.
--
Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20061118/3b0a74f2/attachment.pgp
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list