[darcs-devel] New ignore and unignore commands
Zachary P. Landau
kapheine at divineinvasion.net
Fri Sep 15 06:12:16 PDT 2006
[snip]
> The boring and excluded files have subtly different semantics. Both
> are useful, but I'm not sure that the difference is important enough
> to warrant two distinct notions.
[snip]
> Exclude clearly has the right semantics for an ephemeral setting (a
> command line option, as opposed to a prefs file).
>
> So the distinction is useful, but is it useful enough to be included
> in Darcs, and hence impose an additional conceptual burden on all new
> users? I don't have a strong opinion (I'd like David to make a call),
> but it's certinly not useful enough to take up two good command names
> such as ``darcs ignore'' and ``unignore''.
Okay, I get it now. Thanks Juliusz. And I can see its use. I don't
have a strong opinion either, but I think it might be useful enough to
include it. I'm much less weary of adding -- options over darcs
commands, especially ones that are somewhat common like --exclude is.
I do get that there is a bit more of a conceptual burden, especially
considering that you had to explain on the concept to me :P But on the
other side, new users can feel free to ignore it until they have grasped
the rest of darcs.
Maybe we'll get lucky and someone with a strong opinion about it will
come along.
--
Zachary P. Landau <kapheine at divineinvasion.net>
GPG: gpg --recv-key 0xC9F82052 | http://divineinvasion.net/kapheine.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20060915/2226f515/attachment.pgp
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list