[darcs-devel] patches accepted 2006-09-11
Edwin Thomson
edwin.thomson at businesswebsoftware.com
Thu Sep 21 13:20:22 PDT 2006
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> There's this one, for adding an option to diff for making it apply
>> patches to a slurpy instead of the filesystem.
>
>
>
> What are the tradeoffs? Which should be the default?
Advantages: Much faster for patches near the top of a repo, a bit faster
for patches further down.
Disadvantages: Uses more memory (about 50% more for examining a patch
about halfway down the darcs repo). Also, when I was checking the above,
it turns out there's a bug in it somewhere (looking at the intial import
patch (and probably others) gives "Error moving ./Autoconf.lhs.in to
./Autoconf.lhs" when --store-in-memory is used) which I'll look into
when I'm not so busy. So for now, don't apply it.
Edwin
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list