[darcs-devel] darcs patch: add test for replace that messes with un... (and 3 more)

[Eric Y. Kow]

> Ah, I misread your example.  You're right, that this different from what
> I was talking about.  On the other hand, this case looks like someone has
> just done a manual --force, which is perfectly reasonable.  So I'm still in
> favor of this code, although your objection now makes more sense.

Yeah, I figured it might be safe from a darcs-internals point of view.
I'll push it sometime this week or maybe this weekend.  That said, would
it work as a solution to just remove the
   isJust (apply_to_slurpy (tokreplace f toks old new) work)
since the pristine cache check is all that we really need?

-- 
Eric Kow                     http://www.loria.fr/~kow
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9         Merci de corriger mon français.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20070129/7ed1931a/attachment.pgp