[darcs-devel] darcs patch: Rename --disable-ssh-cm to
--no-ssh-cm. (and 2 more)
David Roundy
droundy at darcs.net
Wed Mar 7 13:26:13 PST 2007
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:53:52PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:48:43PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> > Tweaked as per David's suggestion (and helpful hint)
> >
> > Mon Mar 5 20:59:02 CET 2007 Eric Kow <eric.kow at gmail.com>
> > * Rename --disable-ssh-cm to --no-ssh-cm.
> >
> > This appears to be more consistent with other darcs flags.
> >
> >
> > Mon Mar 5 21:07:52 CET 2007 Eric Kow <eric.kow at gmail.com>
> > * Flip ssh test to accept a --ssh-cm argument
> >
> > Mon Mar 5 21:47:55 CET 2007 Eric Kow <eric.kow at gmail.com>
> > * Add a --ssh-cm flag with --no-ssh-cm as the default.
>
> I would like to pull these into darcs-stable, but they depend on
> the following patches:
>
> Sun Feb 4 19:13:01 CET 2007 Kevin Quick <quick at sparq.org>
> * Added --complement to pull to allow "exclusion" repos
>
> Tue Feb 6 07:52:36 CET 2007 Kevin Quick <quick at sparq.org>
> * Add pull_compl test; note interesting duplicate repo elimination in docs.
>
> Sun Feb 25 12:32:16 CET 2007 Dave Love <fx at gnu.org>
> * Fix bash-ism `export foo=' in tests.
>
> and I don't want to pull any more features (like the complement
> feature) into darcs-stable before the 1.0.9 release. Is it
> possible to re-record the changes against darcs-stable instead?
I'd say that you can do that under your own initiative, and let Eric sort
out the conflict. On the other hand, at least the bash-ism fix is safe, as
it's only in the test suite, and is also sort of an "obvious" fix by an
experienced developer (i.e. who knows shell). But I suppose the bash-ism
fix itself depends on the patches that you don't want.
I'd myself be comfortable with the --complement patches going into
darcs-stable late, but I think that I'm more suited to -unstable branch
development, and your discomfort with major changes probably indicates the
wiser course.
> In case anyone has wondered; I have been extremely occupied
> lately, and will continue be so until at least end of April. I
> won't be able to do much for darcs until then, but I do will try
> to finish 1.0.9. I have a list of a few things that should be
> sorted out first: 1) error message when faced with a hashed
> repository 2) improved help text for Remove (work in progress,
> but stalled), and some kind of improvements for the ssh-problems
> (which I think these patches match).
Good to hear!
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list