[darcs-devel] [issue568] wrong report of "Skipped 6 patches due to dependencies"
Kevin Quick
quick at sparq.org
Wed Jan 30 14:55:14 UTC 2008
Can you run the record with the -v flag to verify that the 191 skips
are not just Makefile changes?
I'll see if I can reproduce this here. Basically after each response
it re-filters the possible and not-possible set of patches before
issuing the next prompt, so the 's'kip on the adddir should have
removed anything dependent on adddir at that point and not later than
that. I assume that sincd the icons directory was new that all the
files in it were adds as well; this may indicate some indistinct
patch dependency relationship between an added directory and its
contents.
-KQ
On 30 Jan 2008, at 4:59 AM, Eric Kow wrote:
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Could you have a second look at this? I don't think this is quite
> the correct
> interaction... (below, icons is a directory with a lot of files).
>
> adddir ./icons
> Shall I record this change? (1/?) [ynWsfvpxdaqjkc], or ? for help: s
> hunk ./Makefile 6
> +pack : reg2008-pack.tex
> + latex2html -no_subdir -init_file pack2html.pl -split 4 $<
> + cp my-$(basename $(<F)).css $(basename $(<F)).css
> +
> Shall I record this change? (2/199) [ynWsfvpxdaqjk], or ? for help: f
> Included record of 191 changes due to dependencies.
>
> ----------
> status: resolved-in-unstable -> chatting
>
> __________________________________
> Darcs bug tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
> <http://bugs.darcs.net/issue568>
> __________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-devel mailing list
> darcs-devel at darcs.net
> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
More information about the darcs-devel
mailing list