[darcs-devel] [issue1400] unrecorded changes lost when renaming and replacing a non standard token?

Ashley Moran bugs at darcs.net
Wed Aug 26 11:54:21 UTC 2009

Ashley Moran <ashley.moran at patchspace.co.uk> added the comment:

On 26 Aug 2009, at 12:13, Eric Kow wrote:

> We're getting closer.  I've simplified away the move, and the weird
> tokens, leaving behind only two elements: --force and an unrecorded
> file and I also get neither backup file nor conflict marker.
> Does the attached file still match your test?

When I run your latest test (in darcs 2.2), I get a backup file  
containing the missing data.  BUT, when I put the move back in, I get  
data loss.  So it appears to be just move+replace causing it, and the  
token string was a red herring.

Do you see the same behaviour as me?


Darcs bug tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: failing-issue1400_replace_backup.sh
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1905 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20090826/1471b3e4/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: unnamed
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20090826/1471b3e4/attachment-0001.diff>

More information about the darcs-devel mailing list