[darcs-devel] [issue1659] whatsnew -l falsely(?) reports R files (2.3.1)

[Petr Ročkai]

Petr Ročkai <me at mornfall.net> added the comment:

Minimal example would be nice, but I think a reproducer would be enough. It may
also be that this is fixed by the pending LookForAdds performance regression
fix, although it does hint at something changing in the semantics of whatsnew.

Interestingly though, the code for whatsnew --look-for-adds in 2.3 is using the
complete old codepath, not involving hashed-storage at all.

But I now see this is not 2.3 afterall, but something that's got even more
patches over 2.3.1 than HEAD (??). Zooko, what darcs is that please?

__________________________________
Darcs bug tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1659>
__________________________________