[darcs-devel] [issue938] darcs transplant

[Reinier Lamers]

Hi all,

On Sunday 06 September 2009 01:04:20 Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> I have a feeling that it will be possible to implement at least some
> aspects of the feature as a separate application using the darcs library,
> without depending on too much stuff that's likely to change fast. If this
> is indeed feasible, is it desirable?

Why would you want to implement as a separate application? If it's highly 
desired darcs functionality, I think it's best to just include it in darcs.

I faintly recall that this discussion has been going on a couple of months 
ago.

Bye,
Reinier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20090906/4abaff98/attachment.pgp>