[darcs-devel] [patch588] Implicitly use unified diff, unless told not to.

[Eric Kow]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 21:39:09 +0000, Owen Stephens wrote:
> Wed Apr  6 22:20:41 BST 2011  Owen Stephens <darcs at owenstephens.co.uk>
>   * Implicitly use unified diff, unless told not to.

Is there any reason ever to emit normal diff output (as opposed to
unified)?

I'd be happier to just kill options outright if nobody is ever going to
need them (the resulting --unified would be recognised but have no effect,
could have help text that says so at first, but in the long run, use
a cmdlib's hidden flag feature)

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or
xmpp:kowey at jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/attachments/20110407/de81e5ec/attachment.asc>