[darcs-devel] [issue2371] user defined command aliases

[Stephen Turnbull]

Stephen Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> added the comment:

Ben Franksen writes:

 > It is also future proof, in that darcs can (and should!) ignore
 > lines

"Can" and "should" are not considerations for backward compatibility.
The question is "does [darcs ignore invalid/meaningless syntax in that
file]?"

__________________________________
Darcs bug tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue2371>
__________________________________