[darcs-devel] [patch1309] commandGetArgPossibilities for apply should not list a...

[Ben Franksen]

Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
> If this fixes http://bugs.darcs.net/issue2420 you may want to name the
> patch accordingly.

It wasn't meant to be. The sole reason I made the patch is that I was 
annoyed to be shown all the irrelevant files in the completion. But I guess 
it will fix the issue nevertheless, so I will amend it as you suggest.

Cheers
Ben
> 2015-03-10 9:26 GMT-03:00 Ben Franksen <bugs at darcs.net>:
>>
>> New submission from Ben Franksen <benjamin.franksen at helmholtz-berlin.de>:
>>
>> 1 patch for repository http://darcs.net/screened:
>>
>> patch 8ddb5c56e4f4c29fb68b5eb151705a6b069a507c
>> Author: Ben Franksen <benjamin.franksen at helmholtz-berlin.de>
>> Date:   Sat Feb 21 23:32:31 CET 2015
>>   * commandGetArgPossibilities for apply should not list all files in the
>>   repo
>>
>> ----------
>> files:
>> commandgetargpossibilities-for-apply-should-not-list-all-files-in-the-
repo.dpatch,
>> patch-preview.txt, unnamed messages: 18286 nosy: bf
>> status: needs-screening
>> title: commandGetArgPossibilities for apply should not list a...
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Darcs bug tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
>> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch1309>
>> __________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> darcs-devel mailing list
>> darcs-devel at darcs.net
>> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
>>
-- 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies and the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
The first method is far more difficult."   ― C.A.R. Hoare