[darcs-devel] [patch1711] resolve various issues with pending

[Ganesh Sittampalam]

Ganesh Sittampalam <ganesh at earth.li> added the comment:

Coming back to this question I asked:

> If information is lost during coalescing, leading to cases where
> decoalesce can't undo a coalesce, then isn't it also possible for
> updatePending to be unable to remove a change that did originate 
> from pending+working?

I've spent a while looking at the code/trying to break darcs,
without success. I think that may be partly because not all possible
can be generated in working as the --look-for options only find certain
kinds of things.

Anyway, I don't think it's worth any more effort; even if it's not
perfect, the new code is an improvement.

----------
status: review-in-progress -> accepted-pending-tests

__________________________________
Darcs bug tracker <bugs at darcs.net>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/patch1711>
__________________________________