[darcs-users] Re: darcs check failure

Peter Simons simons at cryp.to
Thu May 22 20:28:35 UTC 2003


Actually, you were right. The process has no trouble consuming a
gigabyte even! This is a staggering amount of memory for a test case.
Maybe adding a 'seq' here and there will reduce that significantly? Or
perhaps sized QuickCheck generators would yield smaller data; if that
causes the trouble?

I'll look into it ...

Peter





More information about the darcs-users mailing list