[darcs-users] Re: Getting the list of files under version control?

Anthony Towns aj at azure.humbug.org.au
Sun Dec 12 02:21:26 UTC 2004


David Roundy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 06:34:27PM -0500, Michael Conrad wrote:
>>On Friday, December 10, 2004 8:20 AM, David Roundy wrote:
>>>...  I think a --plain option to annotate might be
>>>nice, which would for directories just show a listing of their contents
>>>with no annotations (!) and for files just show their contents (at the
>>>appropriate version) without annotations.  Of course, one could also
>>>consider adding this feature to a renamed "query" command ...
>>$ darcs query controlled .
>>The following files are version controlled by darcs:
>>  ./foo
>>  ./bar
>>  ./blah
>>(that was a ficticious command, for those not aware)
> I think I'd prefer
> darcs query list .
> or perhaps
> darcs query contents .
> (where contents would work for either files or directories).

So would "darcs query manifest" be a reasonable way of generating the 
MANIFEST files we talked about a while ago (ie, listing the repository's 
TAG, and the files in it with sha1 checksums)? I had a look at adding it 
to annotate, but it didn't end up seeming remotely appropriate...

Cheers,
aj




More information about the darcs-users mailing list