[darcs-users] hardlink by default?

[Thomas Zander]

I'm sorry; you're going to have to be more verbose for me; I don't follow 
you reasoning or example here..

On Friday 24 December 2004 06:31, Pat Regan wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 December 2004 16:34, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
> > > The files in current are supposed to reflect the recorded repository
> > > state. Darcs uses current for checking which files have changed,
> > > quickly, without traversing the history. If current was always the
> > > same as working, there could be no current as well.
> >
> > So, please tell us which applications actually change the file without
> > creating a new i-node.  And how common they are on version-controlled
> > files.
>
> What about:
>
> echo Something > a
> ln a b
> echo Something Else > b
> cat a
> cat b
>
> That doesn't appear to be a result that would allow Darcs to function
> properly :).

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20041224/36853c5f/attachment.pgp