[darcs-users] Looks nice. Noob questions.
droundy at abridgegame.org
Mon Jan 19 17:34:47 UTC 2004
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 08:29:12PM -0500, Art Griesser wrote:
> > Well, I very rarely want to use whatsnew --summary...
> Hmm. If you don't mind my curiosity, what do your usage patterns look
> like? I naively expected everybody did this:
> 0. The repository is in synch with the working directory.
> 1. I make changes to the working directory.
> 2. I find the differences between the repo and work dir (whatsnew
> 3. I schedule changes to the repo (requiring explit scheduling avoids
> commiting changes accidentally made to the work dir)
I'm not clear as to what you mean by "schedule changes"... that is, how
step three is distinct from step four.
> 4. I commit the scheduled changes
> 5. Make any necessary changes to work dir (if necessary recreate it) so
> that I am now back in state 0.
My normal sequence is something like
0. The repository is in synch with the working directory.
1. I make changes to the working directory.
2. I use whatsnew to see what changes I've made (especially if some time
has passed and I've forgotten what changes I made).
3. When I've decided that some set of my changes are good (and complete), I
The only time I do your 5. is when I've made temporary changes I don't want
to keep (such as adding debug printfs), in which case I'll generally use a
darcs revert to undo them.
> > You can also schedule the removal of files using "darcs remove", which
> > restores the symmetry. Or you can use the "--look-for-adds" flag to
> > automatically look for additions, which restores the symmetry.
> Unless "darcs record --help" is mistaken, there is no flag to avoid
> automatic removals. This seems to make the situation asymetric, despite
> the "--look-for-adds" flag (which I admit overlooked).
What I mean is that if you use --look-for-adds, then the situation is
symmetric. But really, the fact is that additions and removals are *not*
symmetric. In the case of a removal, darcs knows that it should be keeping
track of changes to that file (because you already told it to), while in
the case of a new file that shows up in the working directory, there is no
way to know if you want it in the repo.
> Would it help the development and spread of Darcs to have a Wiki? If so,
> I would be willing to host one. Gratis, of course.
I do think it would be a good idea. I've been thinking of putting one on
the abridgegame.org site, but I think I'm probably going to be switching
servers some time soon, so that's been put off until I've figured out what
I'm going to do with my server.
More information about the darcs-users