[darcs-users] Re: short options and long names (VOTE!)

[Gabriel Ebner]

Hello,

Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 06:19:47AM -0400, David Roundy wrote:
>>      --summary               summarize changes
> 
> I use this all the time, so a short option would be cool... I see -s is
> taken by --sign, but I'd rather use it for summary (I'm quite biased,
> having never used send)

+1, as I tend to do no darcs changes without a --sum

>>   -a            --all                   answer yes to all patches
>>   -g            --gui                   use graphical interface
>>   -h  --help                shows brief description of command and its
>>   arguments
>>   -m PATCHNAME  --patch-name=PATCHNAME  name of patch
>>   -o FILE       --output=FILE           specify output filename
>>   -r  --recursive           add contents of subdirectories
>>   -t TAGNAME    --tag-name=TAGNAME      name of version to pull
>>   -u                                    pass -u option to diff
>>   -u            --unified               output patch in format similar to
>>   diff -u
>>   -v            --verbose                 give verbose output
> 
> In case anyone votes to remove any of these, I'll pre-emptively
> counter-vote that these are really good short options.

+1

        Gabriel.

-- 
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "ta.renbeleirbag at eg"