[darcs-users] Per-directory version control
Sean E. Russell
ser at germane-software.com
Wed Mar 3 17:10:54 UTC 2004
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 11:20, you wrote:
> directory from consideration when creating patches. I don't see any way
> around the second bit, because foo will need its own patch history
> independent of other projects. Does this seem like what you want (I've
> never had this situation for myself):
... sort of, although it seems like a complex solution to work around what are
fundamentally limitations in the architecture. This leads to making the user
interface more complex simply to keep the back-end simple, which always seems
like a bad idea to me :-)
However, what you suggest -- if indeed possible, would address the problem.
> $ darcs pull
> [pulls all of foo-project]
> Would you like to pull subproject foo? y
This is sort of nice, actually, although I'd guess that the cases where
subprojects are optional to the project would be few. Indeed, I still have a
problem with the mental image that foo is a separate project. For me, it
isn't. It is the sourcecode to the project -- it IS the project.
This is just semantics, though, and wouldn't be a serious barrier.
### http://www.germane-software.com/~ser jabber.com:ser ICQ:83578737
### GPG: http://www.germane-software.com/~ser/Security/ser_public.gpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20040303/79958cdf/attachment.pgp
More information about the darcs-users