[darcs-users] rollback should apply inverse patch to current as well.
darcs at davidb.org
Sat May 8 01:41:19 UTC 2004
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 05:35:05PM -0700, Adam Megacz wrote:
> This makes sense for unrecord, since you're deleting the patch.
> However, in the case of rollback, you're actually *applying* a patch
> (the inverse).
I think the intent of rollback is the same as unrecord, except for
changes that have been push/pulled somewhere else. If the rollback
applied the patches to the current working directory, these changes
would be lost.
Perhaps the behavior could be changed with an option.
More information about the darcs-users