[darcs-users] another confusion re: command names
Timothy_BARBOUR at rta.nsw.gov.au
Wed May 12 00:13:13 UTC 2004
I like the symmetry of pull/unpull (AFAIK they are symmetric). I do not find
it confusing, since I consider its purpose to be the undoing of a pull. Thus
I would not be tempted to use it otherwise, but I suppose it is possible
that I might accidentally unpull a patch that had not been pulled from
another repository, and thereby lose work. Of course, even if darcs knew
which patches had been pulled, it would have no way of knowing whether the
patch still existed in another repository. Perhaps the answer to these
concerns is to make regular backups and replicate repositories.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ganesh Sittampalam [mailto:ganesh at earth.li]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:12 PM
> To: darcs-users at abridgegame.org
> Subject: Re: [darcs-users] another confusion re: command names
> On Tue, 11 May 2004, David Roundy wrote:
> > On the other hand, unpull seems to be a uniformly disliked
> command name, so
> > perhaps removing it and implementing that functionality
> with "unrecord
> > --and-revert" would be best. I'll think on this.
> I don't dislike it, and I like having a short name for that
> which I use a lot.
> darcs-users mailing list
> darcs-users at abridgegame.org
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
More information about the darcs-users