[darcs-users] Re: Limits of Darcs (the whole Linux kernel?)

Samuel Tardieu sam at rfc1149.net
Fri Nov 5 17:12:28 UTC 2004

>>>>> "David" == David Roundy <droundy at abridgegame.org> writes:

David> You could either make more memory available for darcs, or
David> compile darcs with the --enable-antimemoize option.  The
David> initial record is the command which most stresses darcs'
David> memory, as it requires holding the entire tree in parsed and in
David> memory.

So this brings an immediate question: why does darcs need to hold the
entire tree in memory at anytime?

Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

More information about the darcs-users mailing list