[darcs-users] bug report: pull repo, then see that things are new

Taral taral at taral.net
Fri Nov 5 22:06:53 UTC 2004

On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 05:13:48PM -0400, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
> I've hitherto avoided reading the fine manual about "darcs resolve", in 
> the hopes that my uninformed stumbling about would help shake out bugs 
> before the darcs 1.0 release.
> However, as I'm now using darcs professionally in my job, I've decided 
> to go ahead and learn what "darcs resolve" does.
> Let the record show, however, that I got this far without ever 
> understanding "darcs resolve", and I expect that in the future darcs 
> will have a lot more users who don't understand "darcs resolve".

Hm. Good point. Should "darcs get" do a resolve-run too? Or perhaps it
should just print a warning when it sees unresolved mergers?

Taral <taral at taral.net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20041105/480197e5/attachment.pgp 

More information about the darcs-users mailing list