[darcs-users] Colin Walters blogs on Arch changesets vs Darcs

[Colin Walters]

On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 18:03 +1300, Quag wrote:
> > Maybe you can just say that darcs.gnu.org has to be a big machine with
> > 64GB of RAM or whatever, but that doesn't seem like a solution to me.
> 
> I think the key bit you are missing here was the darcs.gnu.org server
> had to be "smart".

No, I agreed, it would be helpful for it to be smart, just like it would
be for Arch.  But just downloading the patches is the the least
important of the issues here, really.  The other issues such as the
history size in the working tree are more important.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20041120/43667fbd/attachment.pgp