[darcs-users] Colin Walters blogs on Arch changesets vs Darcs
ketil at ii.uib.no
Sat Nov 20 09:11:30 UTC 2004
Andrew Pimlott <andrew at pimlott.net> writes:
> It admittedly goes somewhat against the grain of darcs. Furthermore, it
> assumes the user has darcs installed (just as the quoted example assumes
> the user has tla installed), which raises the question of why he didn't
> use darcs to get the code in the first place.
If the person is making a change to the sources from the tarball,
instead of bothering to get the real darcs repo, wouldn't he just mail
the diffs to a maintainer?
Said maintainer would 'get' a new working dir from the tag (you always
tag releases, don't you? Perhaps 'dist' should require the last patch
to be a tag?), apply the diffs with 'patch', record, and pull it
into whatever working tree he likes.
What am I missing?
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the darcs-users