[darcs-users] Colin Walters blogs on Arch changesets vs Darcs
walters at verbum.org
Wed Nov 24 00:03:29 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 12:32 +1300, Quag wrote:
> From my understanding darcs handles this case correctly in that it
> applies the changes to the second file. When the patch is sent
> upstream it is also sent with the downstream history.
Ah, ok. That makes sense, thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20041123/a6ab0410/attachment.pgp
More information about the darcs-users