[darcs-users] Colin Walters blogs on Arch changesets vs Darcs

Colin Walters walters at verbum.org
Wed Nov 24 00:03:29 UTC 2004


On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 12:32 +1300, Quag wrote:

> From my understanding darcs handles this case correctly in that it
> applies the changes to the second file. When the patch is sent
> upstream it is also sent with the downstream history. 

Ah, ok.  That makes sense, thanks.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/attachments/20041123/a6ab0410/attachment.pgp 


More information about the darcs-users mailing list