[darcs-users] A non-proposal [was: a proposal...]

Juliusz Chroboczek jch at pps.jussieu.fr
Wed Nov 24 18:41:10 UTC 2004


Thanks to all of you for your comments.  I'm convinced now, it's back
to the drawing board.

I still have the intuition that the Darcs model is fundamentally right
and needs to be augmented with just a wee bit of metadata to become a
vastly more useful tool.  But simple incoherence as I've described it
appears not to be enough -- simply because it doesn't carry over
commutation.

                                        Juliusz





More information about the darcs-users mailing list