[darcs-users] Colin Walters blogs on Arch changesets vs Darcs

Zooko O'Whielacronx zooko at zooko.com
Wed Nov 24 19:49:44 UTC 2004

On 2004, Nov 24, at 15:34, Kenneth Knowles wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:06:26AM -0400, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
>> (2.a) every single contributor to the shared source must use darcs,
> Or use "diff", and send conventional patches to darcs-using developers.

No, that's what I thought at first.  But unless you do the other part 
of my sentence which is ellided above -- organize a central single 
person to be the patch-accepter and have that personally manually 
inspect and de-duplicate patches before allowing them into darcsword -- 
then you will eventually get two copies or two variants of a patch 
imported from outside-darcs-world to inside-darcs-world.  Inside 
darcsworld, those two patches are like matter and antimatter (hello, 
physics analogies!) -- as soon as they both meet in the same repo then 
that repo will become locked in its O(N^2) merging algorithm until 
someone manually picks it apart and deletes one of the two patches.

This is something that I have been forced to spend my time on almost 
every week for the past few months, so it isn't just hypothetical.  Now 
that I've understood it, I can work around it, but the work-around is 
centralization of the interface between darcsworld and non-darcsworld.

>> if any contributor does not use darcs then all contributors who do use
>> darcs have to agree on a single, centralized, manual mechanism of
>> integrating the non-darcs-user's patches,
> Or any contributor, upon receiving a conventional patch, can apply it 
> to their
> personal repo and record, and anyone else can pick that patch up 
> whenever they
> want.

Any contributor can do it, but if more than one contributor does it 
then you have the matter/antimatter problem.



More information about the darcs-users mailing list