[darcs-users] Colin Walters blogs on Arch changesets vs Darcs

Zooko O'Whielacronx zooko at zooko.com
Thu Nov 25 12:08:56 UTC 2004

On 2004, Nov 25, at 01:02, Ketil Malde wrote:

>> No, that's what I thought at first.  But unless you do the other
>> part of my sentence which is ellided above -- organize a central
>> single person to be the patch-accepter and have that personally
>> manually inspect and de-duplicate patches before allowing them into
>> darcsword --
> Isn't another alternative to assign each non-darcs-using collaborator
> to a darcs-using "godfathers", responsible for integrating changes for
> him?  This way, each collaborator has a single path into darcs, but
> not necessarily the same path.

That is a good idea.  One constraint is that the non-darcs-using 
collaborators can't share patches with each other, or if they do then 
their respective darcs-using godfather's have to compare patches and 
manually de-duplicate.



More information about the darcs-users mailing list