[darcs-users] Re: fixing conflicts in darcs
zindar at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 08:42:36 UTC 2004
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:36:21 +0100, Christoph Wegscheider
<wegi at despammed.com> wrote:
> Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In cvs, since it's centralized I simply don't checkin/submit until I
> > don't have any conflicts. but in darcs I do my records on my local
> > repository and then when I'm about to push/send I get my conflicts,
> > but then they appear in a already "submitted (recorded)" patch. To
> > solve the conflics I've been doing a new "record" and then my
> > send/push. The problem with this is that I get patches that create
> > conflicts, then patches that only fixes conflicts. I would prefer to
> > change the conflicting patch instead.
> > Just to make it real clear, here's an example. I do patch A, B, C and
> > D. Then I pull a new version of the remote repo, I then get a
> > conflict in patch B (btw, how do I know it's in B?) and I have to
> > create a new patch, E to solve B's conflict. I'd like to modify B
> > instead.
> Maybe you are looking for darcs amend-record, that's what I do in a
> situation you described above. I'm also very new to darcs, so there might
> be better ways to do that.
> Of course amend-record is only an option if the record to be modified is
> local only (not pushed/sent yet).
That's what I wanted to do put I should do a unpull first right? And
as you can see In an earlier mail I couldn't do that. That's what so
I'm going to try it more and see if I can make it work.
More information about the darcs-users